Student Association for Voter EmpowermentPosts RSS Comments RSS

Archive for January, 2009

The Case for the College Voters

Written by: Bobby Campbell
Crosspost from the Huffington Post


About a month before my friend Ohio Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones passed away last August, she spoke before a large student gathering and prophetically read the words of Bernice Johnson Regan: “The older I get the better I know that the secret of my going on,” she said, “is when the reins are in the hands of the young, who dare to run against the storm.”

Her words stuck with me ever since; and in these unique times, one week away from a historic election, I can’t help but think that young voters will in fact confirm the late Congresswoman’s wisdom, voting in record numbers. Record turnout in this year’s primaries and caucuses, as well as the steady increase in youth participation since 2000, suggests nothing less. Yet there are those who, after all these years, are still trying to pull the reins from us when it comes to our franchise.

“You don’t understand the issues,” they say, or “you don’t have a family, own a home, and pay property taxes.” Others state “you don’t even live here for the full year,” while some allege that we are simply trying to “dilute their votes.”

I’ve heard all of these claims and many more during the past few months. But with the 2008 election less than one week way, it is likely these challenges will soon escalate–so let me make the case for students.

    • 1. First and foremost, we are not second-class citizens: the laws and judiciaries protect our right to vote. A Supreme Court ruling in 1979, Symm v. U.S., affirmed that college students have an unequivocal right to participate where they attend school.
      2. Students not only care about their college communities, but also give tremendous service to them: I know from my experience at Kenyon College in Gambier, OH that students leave an indelible mark on their communities. Whether through tutoring children; bringing local farm products into campus cafeterias; or cleaning area parks, roads, and forest preserves; college students invest heavily in their school environments.
      3. Students benefit the local economy: college students create hundreds, if not thousands, of jobs for community residents, shop at neighborhood businesses, dine in area restaurants and bars, pay local sales tax, and bring in thousands of visitors each year. In addition, the Census Bureau includes students in their tabulations of local populations. We therefore bring in federal funding and additional statewide resources for community infrastructure projects.
      4. Not all Americans live in fixed locations: many U.S. Citizens, especially young adults, are geographically mobile. Whether moving between cities for different jobs, transferring between academic institutions, or changing housing between semesters, we face particular challenges when it comes to claiming residency. When a student moves, however frequently, and then votes at a new address, it does not mean he or she is trying to circumvent the law or vote fraudulently, but rather trying to perform a civic duty.
  • It seems hypocritical that many of the same people that challenge our rights simultaneously benefit from our residency, while not fully embracing our right to participate in the communities to which we contribute so much. It is therefore critical we make exactly this point throughout the next week; and with the help of college and university professors and administrators, I too am confident that we can seize back the reins and tackle the complex issues of our generation.

    No responses yet

    How Long Do You Have to Stand In Line to Vote Before Your Civil Rights Are Violated?

    Written by: Bobby Campbell
    Crosspost from the Huffington Post


    It’s time we reclaim the media narrative: it seems as though every 15 minutes, a different news network is decrying how the integrity of our elections has been marred and how, no matter what happens now, the result of November 4th should be called into question.

    Well, they are right…but not in regard to the insipid ACORN “voter fraud” scam.

    What we ought to be talking about right now is voter suppression–and the failure of almost everyone in a position of authority to tackle the issue.

    One glaring example is the case of the Democratic secretary of state of Pennsylvania, Pedro Cortes, issuing a policy that would only provide emergency paper ballots to voting precincts when every single voting machine breaks down. So, if you are a voter in Pennsylvania and 7 of your 8 precinct voting machines are broken–well, you’re just going to have to tough this one out.

    What an outrage! And what did the consortium of audacious civil rights organizations do? They filed a lawsuit calling on Secretary Cortes to provide emergency ballots when more than half of the voting machines in a precinct break down. Now that’s bold reform! These civil rights groups, many of whom I work with, ought to be ashamed of themselves. Why? Because this is a half-measure that does not redress the fundamental inequity at hand.

    To illustrate my point, all I need to do is recall my 2004 voting experience at Kenyon College in Gambier, Ohio. Two voting machines were provided. One broke down. That meant that students had to stand in line for 10 hours before they could vote. In fact, the final voter at Kenyon College cast his ballot at 4:04AM the day after the election, when every network had already declared George. W. Bush the winner.

    By the standards of the state of Pennsylvania, Kenyon students would have no recourse to a supplemental emergency ballot in this situation.

    Asking to make this situation just a little less unjust is unacceptable. By asking Pennsylvania to issue emergency ballots only after a majority of machines have broken down, civil rights groups seek to mitigate some of the worst effects of this policy. But the fact remains: it’s still a terrible policy. It’s still disenfranchising voters who have neither the time nor the resources to wait in interminable lines. Demanding anything less than full access to the polls is an abandonment of both our principles and the people we claim to speak for.

    Is this really the best we can do? We cannot accept these lukewarm responses that reflect political relationships far more than democratic principles. We must speak up about the other voter suppression tactics occurring, including deceptive information campaigns, stringent photo ID restrictions, vote caging, vote purging, long lines, machine malfunctions, or improper denial of provisional ballots.

    As an idealistic young American who will soon inherit the plethora of challenges our nation faces, I believe that in spite of our various political affiliations, we cannot stand for this any longer. If we do not have a transparent, accessible, and participatory democracy, then we cannot move forward as a country–regardless of who wins on November 4th.

    No responses yet